Department of English

Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University


 

An Inspector Calls

(1947)

 

J. B. Priestley

(September 13, 1894 – August 14, 1984)

 



 

Notes

An Inspector Calls premiered at the Leningrad Comedy Theatre, Moscow, in 1945. It premiered in London at the New Theatre in October 1946.


164  Steady...the buffs: Note that in the Penguin's 2000 edition of the play, An Inspector Calls and Other Plays, the line is "Steady the Buffs!" which means "calm down"; note also associated connotations of being drunk and of its being an educated class slang


11  party man:


18  public school:

24  it's a bit thick:



 

Programme Note


An Inspector Calls has had a curious history. It was written during the winter of 1944-5, and the Red Army being much in our minds at that time. I sent a copy to Moscow. It was immediately translated and soon two famous Russian companies were playing it simultaneously in Moscow. The Old Vic produced it later in 1945. Then it began to go all over the world (it had 1600 performances in Germany alone), and became equally popular on both sides of the Iron Curtain. I saw it myself, chiefly by accident, in London, Moscow, New York, Paris, and several other cities, and I mention this because, while we are all supposed to be so very different, the reaction of audiences was almost always exactly the same. Even during the last 10 years I have had innumerable letters, from graduates, undergraduates, high school students, from everywhere, demanding to know who or what the Inspector was, there having been furious arguments about him. (Oddly enough, they never asked about the second Inspector who was on his way, though this is not simply a dramatic twist but really the key to the play) [...] A last point. The particular year in which the action is supposed to be happening was not chosen at random: it is significant and is indeed another key to the play.


—J. B. Priestley, "Programme Note," Mermaid Theatre production of An Inspector Calls, 1972, University of Bradford J. B. Priestley Archive



 

Comprehension Check

Act 1

  • Even before Inspector Goole's appearance, what does Eric already know about Sheila and her episode at Milward's? (163, 164)
  • Who are Bernard Shaw and H. G. Wells? (10)
  • What does party mean in Mr. Birling's declaration that he has "always been regarded as a sound, useful party man" (11)?
Act 2
  • What does S.O.S. mean?
Act 3
  • What behaviors of Inspector Goole make the other characters suspect his claim to be a police inspector?
            

 

Study Questions

  • What did you think of the diners before Inspector Goole arrives? What did you think of them after? How do the Birlings and Gerald Croft act differently in the presence of the inspector? What do you think they are reacting to in the person of Inspector Goole? Is it his official capacity as a policeman, his manner or personality, the nature of the investigation, his being a stranger or an intruder into their family celebration, etc.? How does the lighting, "pink and intimate" pre-Goole and "brighter and harder" with Goole (in the Penguin edition), reinforce and visualize Goole's function?

  • How would you describe Goole's questions to the family?

  • At the end of act 1 Sheila tells Gerald Croft "Why—you fool—he knows. Of course he knows. And I hate to think how much he knows that we don't know yet. You'll see. You'll see" (182). Yet earlier the Inspector professes "I don't know—yet" (178). What significance do you find in Priestley's repeated use of the verb to know and to see throughout the play? Is there a difference between knowing and seeing?

  • Despite Inspector Goole's disturbing scrutiny and the difference his presence makes, many of the characters show little sign of change which prompts Sheila's outrage: "You're pretending everything's just as it was before" (219). Why should the inspector's being real matter? What difference does it make if the inspector is not real? Why?

  • How many inspectors are there in this play?
  • Track a word or concept through the play and discuss its various meanings as meant by different characters. Some examples to consider and notice their use and meanings throughout the play:
    • silly
      • I tell you, by that time you'll be living in a world that'll have forgotten all these Capital versus Labor agitations and all these silly little war scares (10)
      • I looked silly in the thing. (25)
      • I know it sounds silly— (30)
      • He's just talking to my son, Eric, who seems to be in an excitable silly mood (32)
    • laugh, laughter, joke, joking, amusement
      • (ERIC suddenly guffaws.) (7)
      • (With hysterical laugh, to GERALD.) (28)
      • He had the laugh on us. (65)
      • You'll have a good laugh over it yet. (66)
    • looking, seeing
      • Look—Mummy— [...] Look, Eric. (9)
      • Look here, sir. Wouldn't you rather I was out of this? (15)
      • All right, Gerald, you needn't look at me like that. (24)
      • You see? What did I tell you? (28)
      • GERALD. I see—
        SHEILA. What do you see? (29)
      • ERIC. [...] Come on, don't just look like that. Tell me—tell me—what happened? (52)
    • real, really, fact
      • And if you'd take some steps to find this young man and then make sure that he's compelled to confess in public his responsibility—instead of staying here asking quite unnecessary questions—then you really would be doing your duty. (46)
      • You know, all he did really was to make us confess. (56)
      • Didn't I say I couldn't imagine a real police inspector talking like that to us? (58)
      • Already we've discovered one important fact—that that fellow was a fraud and we've been hoaxed— (60)
      • Whoever that chap was, the fact remains that I did what I did. (61)
      • I say—there's no more real evidence we did than there was that that chap was a police inspector (62)
      • Everything we said had happened really had happened. (66)
    • nice
      • You seem to be a very well-behaved family to me— (11)
      • You listened to that nice story about me. (29)
      • I suppose we're all nice people now! (59)
      • You may be getting yourselves out nicely, but I can't. (64)
    • loyal, loyalty
    • duty, responsibility, business
      • And I'm talking as a hard-headed, practical man of business. (10)
      • BIRLING. Possibly. But you weren't asked to come here to talk to me about my responsibilities.
        INSPECTOR. Let's hope not. Though I'm beginning to wonder. (40)
      • And if I was, what business is it of yours? (41)
      • What do you make of this business now? Was it a hoax? (59)
      • If anybody's up to the neck in this business, you are, so you'd better take some interest in it. (60)
  • Compare characters' reactions, at different points in the play, to the death that Inspector Goole informs them of that night, for example,
    • ERIC. (Involuntarily.) My God! (14)
    • BIRLING. (Rather impatiently.) Yes, yes. Horrible business. (Drinks.) But I don't understand why you should come here, Inspector—? (14)
    • SHEILA. Oh—how horrible! Was it an accident? (19)
    • MRS. BIRLING. (Same easy tone.) I'm Mrs. Birling, y'know. My husband has just explained why you're here, and while we'll be glad to tell you anything you want to know, I don't think we can help you much. (30)
    • GERALD. (Distressed.) Sorry—I—well, I've suddenly realized—taken it in properly—that she's dead— (35)
    • SHEILA. (Bursting in.) No, no, please. Not that again. I've imagined it enough already. (43)
    • MRS. BIRLING. I'm sorry she should have come to such a horrible end. But I accept no blame for it at all. (46)
    • MRS. BIRLING. (Very distressed now. Rises, a step toward fireplace.) No—Eric—please—I didn't know—I didn't understand— (52)
    • BIRLING. (Unhappily.) Look, Inspector—I'd give thousands—yes, thousands— (53)
    • ERIC. All right, don't pile it on. (65)
  • Time
    • In what way is time and timing important in this play?
    • Consider beginnings and endings in the play. How does it all begin? With whom or with what? How does this play end? Does it end? Where or about what might Sheila Birling's “I don’t know where to begin” (54) be an appropriate description?
  • Which characters want to leave the room/investigation at which point and why?
  • Compare things each character cares about and whether those things have changed throughout the play. For example, what is the meaning of care for Mr. Birling versus for the Inspector?
  • Why does the woman seeking help from the Brumley Women's Charity Organization use the name Mrs. Birling and say that it is "the first she thought of" (197)?
  • Mrs. Birling declares to Goole in act 2 that "If you think you can bring any pressure to bear upon me, Inspector, you're quite mistaken [...] So if I prefer not to discuss it any farther, you have no power to make me change my mind" (197). Does she discuss the girl's request for aid from her charity farther? What power can make Mrs. Birling break her resolve?
  • Compare the Inspector's summary of the evening's interrogation (53) with Mr. Birling's (51, 64–65) and/or Gerald Croft's (62).
  • What does each of the characters eventually pay for what he or she has done? Why should this matter or not matter?
        

    



 

Review Sheet

Characters

Arthur Birling, Mr. Birling – "a fairly prosperous manufacturer" (5); "heavy-looking, rather portentous man in his middle fifties, with fairly easy manners but rather provincial in his speech" (5)

Sybil Birling, Mrs. Birling – "about 50, a rather cold woman and her husband's social superior" (5–6); "a prominent member—of the Brumley Women's Charity Organization" (195); chair of the interviewing committee [of the Brumley Women's Charity Organization] (196)

Sheila Birling – "a pretty girl in her early twenties, very pleased with life and rather excited" (6)

Eric Birling – "in his middle twenties, not quite at ease, half shy, half assertive" (6)

Gerald Croft – "an attractive chap about thirty, rather too manly to be a dandy, but very much the easy well-bred young-man-about-town" (6); "son of Sir George Croft...Crofts Limited"

Edna – the Birlings' "neatly dressed parlor maid, in her late twenties" (5)

Inspector Goole – "need not be a big man but he creates at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness. He is a man in his fifties, dressed in a plain darkish suit of the period. He speaks carefully, weightily, and has a disconcerting habit of looking hard at the person he addresses before actually speaking" 169;

Eva Smith – "her original name—her real name—was Eva Smith" 14

Daisy Renton – "very pretty—soft brown hair and big dark eyes" 35; "lost both parents [...] came originally from somewhere outside Brumley [...] had a job in one of the works here and had had to leave after a strike [...] said something about the shop, too, but wouldn't say which it was" 36
Joe Meggarty, Alderman Meggarty – "half-drunk and goggle-eyed, had wedged her [Daisy Renton] into a corner with that obscene fat carcase of his" (189); "a notorious womaniser and one of the worst sots and rogues in Brumley" (190)

Colonel Roberts – Chief Constable of Brumley; "an old friend" of Arthur Birling, "play[ing] golf together sometimes up at the West Brumley"
Charlie Brunswick – "a friend of min [Gerald Croft], Charlie Brunswick, had gone off to Canada for six months and had let me have the key of a nice little set of rooms he had—in Morgan Terrace [...] so I insisted on Daisy moving into those rooms" (191) 

 

Setting

Time: evening, spring, 1912


Place

England

North Midlands

Brumley

Birlings' house

dining room – "Dining-room of a fairly large suburban house, belonging to a fairly prosperous manufacturer. It is a solidly built room, with good solid furniture of the period. [...] A little upstage of center is a solid but not too large dining room table with solid set of dining room chairs around it. A few imposing but tasteless pictures and engravings. The general effect is substantial and comfortable and old-fashioned but not cozy and homelike." (5)




 

Vocabulary

irony, ironic

contrast

form

thriller

morality

structure

stage directions

act

scene

stage

curtain

set

setting

props

point of attack

dialog

syntax

diction; denotation, connotation

repetition

literal language

figurative language

pun

metaphor

overstatement

understatement

image

imagery

allegory, allegorical

symbol, symbolic, symbolism

gesture

facial expressions

mood

tone

theme


Character, Characterization

major characters
minor characters

protagonist

antagonist

stock or type characters
stereotypes
foil
self-revelation
personality
direct presentation of character
indirect presentation of character
show v. tell
consistency in character behavior
motivation
plausibility of character: is the character credible? convincing?
flat character
round character, multidimensional character
static character, unchanged
developing character, dynamic character, active character
direct methods of revealing character:

indirect characterization


Plot

Freytag's Pyramid

linear, nonlinear, linearity

beginning, middle, end
inciting incident
chance, coincidence

plot, main plot, minor plot, subplot, underplot, double plot,

story
conflict, internal conflict, external conflict, clash of actions, clash of ideas, clash of desires, clash of wills, major, minor, emotional, physical


suspense (suspenseful)
mystery (mysterious, mysteriously, mysteriousness)
dilemma
surprise (surprising, surprised)
plot twist
ending

artistic unity (unified)
time sequence
exposition
in medias res
complication (complicate)
rising action
falling action
crisis
climax
anti-climax (anti-climactic)
conclusion (conclude, conclusive)
resolution (resolve, resolving)
denouement
flashback, retrospect
back-story
foreshadowing
causality
plot structure
initiating incident
epiphany

recognition

reversal
catastrophe
deus ex machina
disclosure, discovery
movement, shape of movement
trajectory
change
focus

 

 


 

Sample Student Responses to J. B. Priestley's An Inspector Calls

Response 1:

 

 

 

 

 

Kanokwan Surapornchai

2202234 Introduction to the Study of English Literature

Acharn Puckpan Tipayamontri

June 10, 2009

Reading Response 1

 

Title

 

Text

 

 

 

 

 

            

 



 

FAQ and Discussion
Q: Who or what is Inspector Goole? Is he a ghost?

D1: Goole is a homophone of ghoul so the ghostly pun is likely intentional since it also underscores his haunting questions and messages as well as the mysterious ending of the play.

D2: This has got to be a top hit question like "Who is Godot?" in Beckett's Waiting for Godot. Is he God? Why does Goole being a ghost seem so appealing? Why would we want him to be? Can't he be a prankster sympathetic to Eva/Daisy's suicide? A Marxist local who decides to teach the selfish Birlings a lesson? Or an allegorical materialization of our/society's own consciousness?

D3: His questions and messages are supposed to haunt us more than his mysterious identity.

D1: I think his mysterious identity is part of his message because it asks us to think about why it matters. Why do we want to know so much who Goole really is? How differently do we and the Birlings react to each of Goole's possible identities? How easily do/would we/they dismiss his actions and words if he's a real inspector, a fraud, a specter (another possible pun?), a conscience, God, an angel, a joker, just a man, an influential and respected playwright, a propagandist?

D3: Which is a reflection on us, in a way, because it reveals whether or not we are classist or prejudiced depending on who we give more attention to?

D2: It's a telling response: us being more concerned with Goole and his actions rather than being concerned with who we are and our actions. Despite the play, like Mr. and Mrs. Birling and Gerald Croft after their experience that evening, we would rather not investigate ourselves. We would rather deflect, and obsess over another—a scapegoat person or issue. This reminds me of a prank by The Yes Men who impersonated a Dow Chemical spokesperson on BBC, finally accepting responsibility for the Bhopal gas catastrophe that destroyed over 100,000 lives. The BBC anchor agreed that Bhopal was a tragedy and even said that the Dow help comes many years late. But when the BBC found out that Jude Finisterra, the spokesman, was fake, they were outraged at The Yes Men for hurting the Bhopal victims by giving them false hope. Amazingly, no outrage was directed at Dow Chemical, owner of Union Carbide who has indeed hurt and killed thousands of people and never adequately cleaned up the industrial disaster which occurred in 1984 or compensated the victims for it.

D3: Which is more unreal, that some people can hurt and kill other people and not believe that they have done so or feel bad about it (and will never be punished for it), or that a man comes to a well-to-do family and asks its members to consider their actions and to care about those they've hurt along the way, then leaves, then found out not to be who he says he is, and is followed by a telephone call announcing an inspector is on the way to ask questions about a tragedy similar to the one already spoken about?

D4: Yes, which is more unreasonable? or shocking (or, as Eric Birling says, "frighten[ing]" 220)? And, in fact, Inspector Goole is who he says he is. His lying or pretending to be someone he's not is more the fabrication of the Birlings themselves. Think about it, all he tells the family is "It's my duty to ask questions" (173) and that his name is Goole. That he is an inspector is an understanding that comes from what he does—inspect—and that he is a police inspector, as opposed to any other kind of inspector, is information that comes from Edna, an assumption she makes, perhaps, from what he looks like or should be (169).

D1: You're right! He never actually says he's a police inspector or that he's stationed at Brumley when interrogated. He only admits to being new when Mr. Birling tries to intimidate him with "You're new, aren't you?" (169). He says he's "only recently transferred" but not from what or to where. He doesn't see much of Chief Constable, Colonel Roberts and he doesn't play golf (173, 174).

D2: He says "I'm a police inspector" later to Sheila who just enters the room and asks "What business? What's happening?" (175). He does give glimpses into his preoccupations when he says that "it might be" his concern how Mr. Birling chooses to run his business (172), and of the nature of work or "business" he does when he declares "One person and one line of inquiry at a time" (171). So one might ask instead what kind of police he is and what he is policing?

D4: He doesn't seem concerned with Sheila and Gerald's realigning their relationship, saying "You can settle that between you afterwards," being rather more interested in having Sheila recount "What happened?" (180), and refusing lies: "You're not telling me the truth" (195). Sheila observes in act 2 that "he's giving us rope—so that we'll hang ourselves" (188).

D3: Perhaps he's not so much a ghost as a spirit.

D1: Theatrically speaking he can be a personification or materialization of conscience. Or, as you say, the spirit of conscience.


 

 


Links
Productions
Articles

British History

 

Media



  • An Inspector Calls, dir. Michael Simpson, perf. Bernard Hepton (1982 BBC TV drama; 1 hr. 19:12 min.)

  • An Inspector Calls, dir. Aisling Walsh (2015 BBC TV film; 1 hr. 12:32 min.)

  • An Inspector Calls, dir. Stephen Daldry (2005 trailer; 1:42 min.)

  • "J. B. Priestley Exhorts People to Sing," A World at War, Movietone News (1:55 min.)
 


J. B. Priestley

 

Reference


Priestley, J. B. An Inspector Calls. 1945. New York: Dramatists Play Service, 1972. Print.


Priestley, J. B. An Inspector Calls: A Play in Three Acts. 1947. An Inspector Calls and Other Plays. London: Penguin, 2000. 158–220. Print.


Further Reading


Priestley, J. B. An Inspector Calls and Other Plays. London: Penguin, 2000. Print.


 


Home  |  Literary Terms  |  Learning English  


Last updated September 24, 2019